In the wake of the 9/11 attacks and the capture of hundreds of suspected al Qaeda and Taliban fighters, we have been engaged in a national debate as to the proper standards and procedures for detaining “enemy combatants” and prosecuting them for war crimes. Dissatisfaction with the procedures established at Guantanamo for detention decisions and trials of detainees for war crimes by military commissions, and concerns about the feasibility of conducting major terrorism trials in regular Article III courts, have led to proposals to establish a special National Security Court.
This new court, which would have greater flexibility to conduct non-public proceedings than do the regular federal courts, could make or review status and detention decisions and/or conduct trials of suspected terrorists. The conference will discuss the pros and cons of establishing such a new federal court, and what jurisdiction should be assigned to such a court.
Agenda
-
February 1
-
Welcoming Remarks
-
Panel 1: War or Crime? The Legal Framework for Detaining and Prosecuting Enemy Combatants
John B. Bellinger III Co-Chair, Global Law and Public Policy - Arnold & Porter -
Moderator
-
Lunch with Keynote Speaker
-
Panel 2: A National Security Court for Detention Decisions
-
Panel 3: A National Security Court for Terrorist Crimes
James Baker Former Brookings Expert, Former General Counsel - FBI, Director of National Security and Cybersecurity - R Street Institute @thejimbaker
-