UPDATE: Cheng Li and Ryan McElveen say that pessimistic views of the upcoming plenum “fail to capture the leadership’s momentum, sense of urgency, and collective understanding of the need to embark on big, bold and broad reforms to gain public support before it’s too late.”
On October 31, four Brookings China experts from the John L. Thornton China Center discussed what to expect from the upcoming Third Plenum of the 18th Chinese Communist Party Congress scheduled for Nov. 9-12. Many observers will watch this meeting for insights on how President Xi Jinping’s administration will embark on reforms affecting the second biggest economy in the world and beyond.
“Can China simultaneously loosen economically while it attempts to tighten politically?” – Jonathan Pollack
Jonathan Pollack, director of the China Center, opened the session with an overview of the reform process over the last five to 10 years. He posed a couple of key questions for the panel and audience to consider during the 90-minute session:
#China3rdPlenum expert Jonathan Pollack: reform process seriously stalled over yrs. Can it be regenerated and if so, over what interests?
— Brookings FP (@BrookingsFP) October 31, 2013
Jonathan Pollack: Can #China loosen economically while tightening up politically? Tweet thoughts with #China3rdPlenum
— Brookings FP (@BrookingsFP) October 31, 2013
The third plenary session will herald in a “2.0 version” of China market development, said Cheng Li, director of research for the China Center. Li admitted that cynicism on such development existed, but thought that the current leadership has momentum behind them to make a statement on issues such as economic liberalization, fiscal reform, deregulation, urbanization, land use and the role of state-owned enterprises.
“The stakes of this November meeting for President Xi Jinping and the Chinese leadership are very high, and so are public expectations.” – Cheng Li
This sentiment resonated with Distinguished Fellow Javier Solana, who re-tweeted select remarks after the event.
“@BrookingsFP: Cheng Li: while cynicism exists, new leadership has momentum. Need to do something big, broad, bold. #China3rdPlenum”
— Javier Solana (@javiersolana) October 31, 2013
Cheng Li: Stakes of this #China3rdPlenum are high. New leadership simply cannot forsake this opportunity.
— Brookings FP (@BrookingsFP) October 31, 2013
David Dollar, previously a U.S. Treasury representative in Beijing, takes a more cautious and contrasting approach to the potential of the third plenum. Dollar, now a senior fellow at Brookings, told the audience that while he expected to hear more detail about fiscal and financial reforms, he will also pay attention to how reforms are implemented over the following months.
.@davidrdollar: I’m not as optimistic as Cheng Li that #China3rdPlenum will come out with detailed, bold plan.
— Brookings FP (@BrookingsFP) October 31, 2013
.@davidrdollar: Even if positive impression of reform from #China3rdPlenum, implementation will be something to watch over next months.
— Brookings FP (@BrookingsFP) October 31, 2013
“I am cautiously optimistic that at the third plenum or shortly afterwards well see some very concrete reforms in the fiscal sector and in fiscal policy.” – David Dollar
Erica Downs, an expert on China government-business relations, focused her remarks on how Chinese companies will react to potential plenum-influenced changes toward a growth model focused on productivity and consumption.
Downs also focused on how these changes will affect U.S. businesses, particularly regarding trade.
Erica Downs: More interest China has in US, more potential of bilateral trade agreement #China3rdPlenum
— Brookings FP (@BrookingsFP) October 31, 2013
Brookings Senior Fellow Kenneth Lieberthal, seated in the audience, asked the panelists if potential trade agreements between the U.S. and China can be a point of leverage for reforms, and if there are potential stumbling blocks if and when the U.S. Congress considers such proposals.
“The United States is likely to remain an increasingly important destination for Chinese companies.” – Erica Downs
Dollar remarked that if the U.S. and China can establish trade agreements with each other, it would be a powerful statement on the status of global affairs and that Congress should understand such implications.
.@ChinaKenL asks #China3rdPlenum panel about #TPP, trade agreements as pt of leverage in China. Will we run into Congress stumbling blocks?
— Brookings FP (@BrookingsFP) October 31, 2013
.@davidrdollar: If US, China can negotiate trade agreemnt, powerful statement. Hope congress understand heft of this. #China3rdPlenum
— Brookings FP (@BrookingsFP) October 31, 2013
Other highlights from the panel discussion included an exchange on what parts of the plenum would have greater impact: announcing the intent of reforms or actual implementation of reforms. Li argued that if the plenum results in an outline of the direction reforms will take, particularly in regard to economic liberalization, that would be as important a step as implementation would be.
Cheng Li: if #China3rdPlenum can outline direction, addressing liberalization, would be big thing.
— Brookings FP (@BrookingsFP) October 31, 2013
Another theme from the panel was the need for greater openness: economic openness, freedom of movement and freedom of the press are necessary for China to establish an innovation-led economy that can grow.
Cheng Li: An Innovation-led economy requires economic, media freedom. #China3rdPlenum
— Brookings FP (@BrookingsFP) October 31, 2013
.@davidrdollar: if you free up movement of people, tend to move to higher productivity, helps with aggregate prod growth. #China3rdPlenum
— Brookings FP (@BrookingsFP) October 31, 2013
After the panel, David Dollar (@DavidRDollar) answered questions on Twitter regarding some of the economic reforms mentioned during the discussion:
@RyanLMcElveen local govs want to float bonds, get more financing; prop tax more controversial bc of house price effect #china3rdplenum
— David Dollar (@davidrdollar) October 31, 2013
@BrookingsFP SOE reform comes up indirectly thru financial liberalization and opening more sectors to private inv
— David Dollar (@davidrdollar) October 31, 2013
@BrookingsFP Unlikely to take on SOE reform directly #China3rdPlenum
— David Dollar (@davidrdollar) October 31, 2013
.@BrookingsFP More econ openness would spur innovation but in the longer term China needs pol liberalization as well #china3rdplenum
— David Dollar (@davidrdollar) October 31, 2013
@javiersolana @BrookingsFP But it’s hard to root out corruption without independent judiciary and free media #China3rdPlenum
— David Dollar (@davidrdollar) October 31, 2013
.@BrookingsFP Middle class wants freedom of movement and discussion or more professionals will leave #China3rdPlenum
— David Dollar (@davidrdollar) October 31, 2013
Tina Trenkner compiled this event summary and also managed the Twitter chat. Colleen Lineweaver also contributed to this post.
The Brookings Institution is committed to quality, independence, and impact.
We are supported by a diverse array of funders. In line with our values and policies, each Brookings publication represents the sole views of its author(s).
Commentary
Brookings China Experts Examine Upcoming Chinese Communist Party Congress Plenum
November 5, 2013